These guidelines are being prepared to alert people searching for residential facilities, whether parents or professionals, to issues that often do not get sufficient attention even in the best of schools, treatment centers and programs. We may have under-emphasized standard characteristics that we think most well run programs attempt to meet and most people considering these facilities think about. This is intended to call attention to the issues that make a difference among the better resources.

• This starts out as a set of guidelines from just one consulting firm and that may seem presumptuous. But Tom Croke in that firm brings 40 years of experience in dealing with special needs issues and more than 15 as an educational consultant. More importantly we hope to mature these guidelines with input from many additional sources with some of the benefits of an "open source" resource.  We don't expect these guidelines to become law, but we do think they represent issues that ought to be considered in every search or enrollment. We welcome and will publish vigorous but respectful dissent. Hopefully our point of view will never be the final word but will be the opening for discussion.
• No program that we are aware of meets all proposed criteria. We attempt to be clear which criteria are commonly met currently and which are rarely met.

(Article continues below box)

• We intend to encourage programs to meet these criteria
• We are guided in our referral process by the degree to which programs conform to these guidelines.  We encourage parents doing web searches to do the same.
• We use the word “client” to describe any young person who might be enrolled in any of the programs referenced here. Others might apply the terms “student,” “patient,” “struggling teen,” “resident,” or some other term, and that term might be more appropriate in some situations.
• We use the term “program” to refer to therapeutic schools, emotional growth schools, wilderness programs, residential treatment centers, group homes and other points of service where clients live at the point of service rather than in their own homes.

These are our current  and anticipated areas where we suggest guidelines: 

1. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Safety
2. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Basic and Core Issues
3. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Clinical Resources
4. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Staffing
5. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Emotional Growth Programming
6. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Transition and Aftercare
7. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Family Participation
8. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Substance Abuse Treatment
9. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Short Term Evaluation and Treatment Programs
10. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Wilderness Programs
11. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Length of Stay
12. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Case Management
13. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Spiritual Life and Development
14. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Use of Transports or Escorts
15. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Educational Services in Treatment and Emotional Growth Programs
16. FamilyLight^sm Guidelines for Marketing and Promotion
17. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Communication
18. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for School and Program Ownership
19. FamilyLight^smGuidelines for Outcomes
20. FamilyLight^smExtra Credit Guidelines

Feedback is invited. We will publish selected feedback.  Email:  FamilyLightResponse@yahoo.com

Disclaimer: No  program review, no matter how positive, is a blanket endorsement. No criticism is a blanket condemnation.  When we express our level of confidence in a school or program, that is our subjective opinion with which others might reasonably disagree.  When we assert something as fact, we have done our best to be accurate, but we cannot guarantee that all of our information is accurate and up to date. When we address compliance with our guidelines, you need to remember that these are only OUR guidelines -- not guidelines from an official source.  We have also set the bar very high, and do not expect any school or program to be in total compliance.  It is not appropriate to draw a conclusion of impropriety (or even failure to live up to conventional wisdom) from our lack of confidence in a school or program or from less than perfect conformity to our guidelines.  Some will say we expect too much. Readers are responsible for verifying accuracy of information supplied here prior to acting upon it. We are not responsible for inaccuracies.

Last updated 10-07-08