Aspen Marketing --
Quid pro Quo -- Special Events
Return to immediate prior page in sequence: Aspen Marketing -- Quid pro Quo -- Exorbitant Perks
Return to Aspen Marketing -- Main Article
It as been Aspen’s practice to provide one or two major events each year for their best referral sources and for referring professionals they are trying to attract. (We hear that during the recession this has been cut back to one event). These tend to be situated at resort hotels, and feature educational events with world class speakers. For their educational value, we see no problem. For an opportunity to describe their offerings to potential referral sources, we have no problem.
consultant, Tom Croke, has attended two of these events, one in
our defense, one thing is clear: the invitations could not have been
extended as a reward for our referral pattern leading up to those
events. While we do refer to Aspen programs when we believe they are
genuinely the best choice, we are not likely to be confused with a
referral source having the volume of referral that
each case the educational value was tremendous, and the exposure to the
Even if all of the events were entirely appropriate to an educational purpose and/or to informing potential referral sources about Aspen facilities, we are still not convinced that it is within Principles of Good Practice of NATSAP or within our guidelines for this kind of educational opportunity to be offered specifically in reaction to a referral pattern, as Ms. Evans specifically indicated.
That means we are unsure that NATSAP member programs owned by a parent company that offers lavish “thank you” events as rewards are in compliance with NATSAP’s Principles of Good Practice and we are not sure that IECA member consultants who attend such events pursuant to strong referral patterns to Aspen are in compliance with Principles of Good Practice of IECA. We also doubt that the question will ever be resolved unless someone brings a formal complaint.
president of Aspen, Jim Dredge told us that these events were his idea,
intending to create an opportunity for people with professional interest
to have an opportunity to hear world class speakers in a relaxing
setting without being exposed to marketing pressures.
That would be fine if
do not believe we are in danger of being invited to these events any
time soon, but we would not be comfortable attending such events, if
Navigating the Aspen Marketing article
Too often we hear of clinicians advising parents that sending their child to a therapeutic program away from home is only a good idea if it is an Aspen program. Clinicians and other referring professionals who give that advice are likely falling victim to . . . (more)
2. Web Advertising.
further example of where we would like to see improvement at Aspen/
CRC Health Group involves their
web advertising. We saw temporary
improvement about the time we previously called public attention to
this, but it appears the problem is back, or maybe it never left and we
just missed it. (more)
3. Quid pro quo marketing. Quid pro quo marketing is providing some incentive, often an item of value in exchange for business. It is not like the “cents off” coupon from your neighborhood grocery store; it is more like paying someone who appears to be a neutral source to tell you that is the best grocery store in town. We are not accusing Aspen or CRC Health Group of actual payoffs or referral fees to educational consultants. We will let you decide whether or not what we describe crosses any troubling lines. (more)
Aspen, to its great credit, commissioned an extensive outcome study blanketing its schools, excluding its wilderness programs. The problem arises when the study is used to convince others of the effectiveness of one school or treatment center, ignoring the fact that the results of many schools have been lumped together. (more)
a person is referred to an Aspen school or program, upon completion of
Feedback is invited. We will publish selected feedback. Email FamilyLightResponse@yahoo.com
Disclaimer: No program review, no matter how positive, is a blanket endorsement. No criticism is a blanket condemnation. When we express our level of confidence in a school or program, that is our subjective opinion with which others might reasonably disagree. When we assert something as fact, we have done our best to be accurate, but we cannot guarantee that all of our information is accurate and up to date. When we address compliance with our guidelines, you need to remember that these are only OUR guidelines -- not guidelines from an official source. We have also set the bar very high, and do not expect any school or program to be in total compliance. It is not appropriate to draw a conclusion of impropriety (or even failure to live up to conventional wisdom) from our lack of confidence in a school or program or from less than perfect conformity to our guidelines. Some will say we expect too much. Readers are responsible for verifying accuracy of information supplied here prior to acting upon it. We are not responsible for inaccuracies.
Last revised April 12, 2010
|"Solutions, Not Just Referrals"|
For information regarding use of content of this website, click here